This interview consists of 7 questions. You may answer each question either in writing or by using the voice feature.

Hi, my name is Kabooxa, and I will be your interviewer today.

Hello Sheraz, thank you for speaking with me at Money20/20 Europe 2026. My first question is: 1. With your recent initiative *Lightningbox* in Geneva involving partners like Circle, MultiversX, and Hacken to foster Web3 innovation, how do you plan to scale this sandbox to integrate stablecoin adoption into mainstream finance, particularly under the regulatory frameworks being shaped across Europe and beyond?

No problem, Sheraz—thanks for your honesty. To help frame that better: From Storm’s perspective, what are the biggest regulatory hurdles you anticipate when trying to operationalize stablecoins in the sandbox across Europe, and how are you preparing to address those obstacles?

Here’s how I see the regulatory hurdles ahead from Storm’s standpoint, along with how we’re preparing to address them: --- **Regulatory Hurdles** 1. **Multi-Issuer Stablecoin Risk & Reserve Fragmentation** Under the EU’s MiCA framework, there’s concern over stablecoins issued both inside and outside the EU (the “multi-issuer” model). When issuance happens across jurisdictions, reserve assets may be split and governed by different regimes, making it uncertain whether reserves held abroad will be available in a stress scenario where EU users demand redemptions. ([cepr.org](https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/multi-issuer-stablecoins-threat-financial-stability?utm_source=openai)) 2. **Impact on Monetary Sovereignty & Policy Transmission** As stablecoins, especially non-euro pegged ones, grow in usage in Europe, they could challenge the effectiveness of central bank tools. Regulators are particularly alert to how stablecoins might dilute control over money supply and disturb how monetary policy filters through to the real economy. ([ccn.com](https://www.ccn.com/news/c*****/wall-street-onchain-stablecoins-settlement-rail/?utm_source=openai)) 3. **Regulatory Fragmentation & Arbitrage Vulnerabilities** Despite MiCA, there remains uneven regulation among EU member states, and between EU and non-EU jurisdictions. That regulatory patchwork can be exploited. Entities could issue stablecoins under more lenient jurisdictions or under non-EU rules, creating risks of arbitrage, compliance gaps, and weakened enforcement. ([airwallex.com](https://www.airwallex.com/us/blog/stablecoin-cross-border-payments?utm_source=openai)) 4. **Compliance Burden & Operational Costs** The compliance, reporting, reserve transparency, risk management, licensing and oversight demands under new regulation (MiCA and related rules) are heavy. These raise costs and complexity, potentially threatening the speed and scalability needed for mainstream financial integration. ([mondaq.com](https://www.mondaq.com/fin-tech/1603362/stablecoins-unstable-in-europe?utm_source=openai)) 5. **Customer Protection & Redemption Guarantees** Regulators insist that stablecoin users must have clarity and confidence about what backs the coins, and assurance about redeemability. Any ambiguity around reserves, collateral liquidity, or redemption terms could trigger runs if confidence erodes. ([ecb.europa.eu](https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/financial-stability-publications/macroprudential-bulletin/html/ecb.mpbu202005_1~3e9ac10eb1.ga.html?utm_source=openai)) --- **How Storm Is Preparing** - We’re designing Lightningbox so that reserve backing conforms strictly to MiCA standards: fully liquid, high-quality, euro-denominated assets, with custody controlled under EU supervision. - We’re engaging proactively with EU regulators, central banks, and legal experts to ensure our issuance model avoids multi-issuer pitfalls. If needed, we’ll localize issuers/reserves to EU member states to ensure compliance and regulatory clarity. - We’ve built operational capacity to handle rigorous reporting, auditing, and transparency obligations in real time, so that users and authorities have visibility on collateral, liquidity stress tests, and risk reserves. - We’re investing in legal structures that ensure redemption obligations are explicitly enforceable under EU law, with minimal counterparty or jurisdictional risk. - Finally, we’re aligning with industry bodies and policy forums to help shape evolving regulation — so that we can scale stablecoin usage in ways that support innovation but also prioritise systemic safety and trust. --- If you like, I can walk you through some specific elements in Lightningbox that reflect this readiness from a technical or legal design perspective.

Yes, I inadvertently answered my own question rather than prompting Sheraz to share his perspective. My apologies—I’ll ensure the questions stay yours to answer.

This question is out of context.

Chat is ended. Please click on Start Button to start a new chat.